Editorials for 2001 and 2002 are filed here, most recent date first.



(12/02) STRUCTURAL IMBALANCE or INSTITUTIONAL BIAS? It lists ten key areas where NARPAC disagrees with Brookings assertions that DC needs permanent $400-600M annual federal compensation due to the inconvenience and fiscal strain caused by the presence of the nation's capitol.

(11/02)GETTING THE PLAYERS READY FOR ACT II--This Not the Time for Re-Runs It urges DC's leaders to build on their current successes and expand their horizons nationally, regionally, and locally.

(10/02)DC's DEVELOPMENT CART IS WAY AHEAD OF ITS UNBRIDLED PLANNING HORSE. It points out that while DC's economic development is forging ahead, there seems to be no comprehensive up-to-date planning behind it.

(09/02)FOCUSING ON THE WORST THAT MIGHT BE-- AND IGNORING THE BAD THAT'S HERE. It decries the urge for regional cooperation against unlikely foreign enemies, while neglecting regional cooperation to cure the problems of concentrated poverty in the national capital metro area.

(08/02) FORMULA FOR MEDIOCRITY: When Leaders Settle for Playing the Hand They've Been Dealt . It suggests that DC will never earn national pride as a capital city as long as its leaders don't squarely face up to its longstanding, and continuing, personnel problems.

(07/02)MIXING 21ST CENTURY RELIGION AND POLITICS: Crossing the Lines, Globally and Locally . It suggests that DC's black ministry should spend more time helping young women avoid pregnancy and poverty, and less time panning the mayor for doing his job.

(06/02)CONGRESS MUST REDEFINE NATIONAL WELFARE THIS YEAR: How about Redefining the Welfare of the Nation's Capital City Too?. It suggests that while Congress is giving states more autonomy, it should also assist the District in two different ways to become more financially self-sufficient.

(05/02) DISTORTING DC'S REAL 'STRUCTURAL IMBALANCE': The Growth of a Dangerous Myth
NARPAC believes that the real "structural imbalance" threatening DC's financial posture is not the Federal presence in the capital city but excessive poverty without the land use plan to deal with it.

(04/02) WASHINGTON AREA TRANSPORTATION: CODE ORANGE, Politicians Fiddle While Chaos Grows
concludes that the sound development of the nation's capital metro area is at far greater risk from inattention to its long-range transportation needs than from the heinous acts of a few deranged terrorists.

suggests that poor test scores and school performance should be directly linked to parental education which is the primary determinant in household income and poverty.

(02/02)IMPROVING DC HOUSING: Progress with Risk
indicates both the benefits and potential risks implicit in underwriting better low income housing

(01/02)2001 in WASHINGTON, DC A TALE OF TWO CITIES AT WAR (As Viewed from the Bleachers)
assesses DC's limited progress over the past year in fighting nine domestic urban wars, and compares it wistfully to the President's single focus approach to the War on Evildoers


(12/01)STUCK ON THE BACKSIDE OF THE POWER CURVE--Ever More Resources, Ever Slower Progress
addresses the growing need for better long-range transportation planning if the metro area is to keep its economic growth healthy in the post-recession era;

(11/01)AMERICA'S CAPITAL CITY AT WAR -- Symbol of Strength or Proof of Weakness?
outlines what DC residents will need to do to project a strong national image of America's will to win the war against evildoers;

(10/01)NEW DEMANDS ON THE NATION'S CAPITAL CITY -- Ground Zero in The First Holy War of The 21st Century?
deals with the 9/11 American tragedy and suggests that DC's focus should be adjusted towards the bigger picture and the new realities;

(9/01)VERY GOOD NEWS FOR THE DCPS CLASS OF 2010 --But What about the Class of 1990?
deals with the need to provide a second chance for DCPS drop-outs as a key part of "breaking the cycle" of school system failure;

(8/01)TIME FOR THE "V-WORD"AT LAST? Let the Vision Debate Begin!
outlines the new "Rivlin Vision" of DC ten years hence, based on residential expansion, and compares it with the new "NARPAC Vision", favoring commercial growth, and urges that a serious debate on this important subject begin

points to this Spring's 'horror stories' in the local press as evidence that DC's bureaucracy remains dysfunctional despite rapid economic growth in the private sector

(6/01)A RARE OPPORTUNITY TO THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX About the Future of Our National Capital City and Metro Area
points to the forthcoming joint House-Senate hearing on the 'Outlook for the DC Government', and reiterates NARPAC's longstanding arguments for restructuring Congressional oversight for the good of the city and its metro area and other US metro areas as well;

(5/01)THE ART OF GOVERNING AND BEING GOVERNED--and Avoiding Panderers' Box
points out some of the socio-economic factors that make DC difficult to govern, and the need to assure the ultimate success of the bitterly-fought DC Health Care decision with special safeguards;

spells out the underlying rationale for believing that risks of 'class warfare' will continue to tarnish the luster of the American dream

lists 10 persistent myths about how DC should evolve as the core city of a first-rate 21st Century metro area: how many do you think are fact rather than fiction?

(2/01)MILESTONES and MILLSTONES: Progress, sure--but toward what?
notes twelve big changes in place for 2001, but wonders how much difference they will make;

(1/01)KICK STARTING DC'S THIRD CENTURY-- Headlines from Dreamland
summarizes the most important of NARPAC's 52 "most wanted" hypothetical headlines for 2001;

Click here for a Quick Summary of 1999-2000 editorials

Click here for a Quick Summary of 1997-1998 editorials

December, 2002

Under the respected imprimatur of the Brookings Institution, renowned in many policy areas, Dr. Alice Rivlin, former Control Board Chair, and her close colleague Carol O'Cleireacain have produced another version of their favorite theme: that DC should receive a permanent, 100% bullet-proof, incentive-less annual federal payment to make up for the inconveniences and fiscal strain caused by the presence of the nation's capitol. Titled "A Sound Fiscal Footing for the Nation's Capital: A Federal Responsibility", it depends on untested, third-party statistics to support the authors' long-standing assertions that an attractive, decent DC cannot be expected to pay its own bills, despite four straight years of budget surpluses.

NARPAC, on the other hand, is a small, single-purpose non-profit educational/analytical group devoted solely to improving national pride in America's capital and making it the best American core city in the best American metro area. We do not believe DC need become a Federal ward, nor that this report accurately represents the facts or the practical options for DC's future. Here are ten key (abbreviated!) Brookings (B) assertions and NARPAC (N) rejoinders from the many included in NARPAC's detailed web site critique of this work:

(B) DC's balance between revenues and expenditures is "precarious" for the foreseeable future.
(N) "Current services" budget projections by fiat ignore valuable changes in revenues and spending.

(B) DC spends 40% ($240M) of its police/FEMS budget on federal facilities, tourists, and demonstrators.
(N) DC probably spends less than 10% ($30M) of its revenues just from tourism on federal property safety.

(B) Foregone taxes on federal-related property, income, and sales may cost the city $750M annually.
(N) DC's federal property assessments are dubious: half are maintained for public use by the Park Service.

(B) DC misses as much as $1.2 billion in commuter income taxes who use DC's roads, street lights, etc.
(N) Commuters cost city little; feds pay major road costs; options exist to up parking, public transport fees.

(B) "Statelessness" prevents favorable transfer payments; but DC's remaining state functions cost $500M.
(N) DC is too wealthy to gain from transfers; and could lower "state costs" if it didn't yearn to be a state.

(B) DC suffers from legacy of infrastructure neglect, decades of lost revenues from declining population.
(N) DC received federal payments all that time, and lost almost no taxpayers; but many tax consumers.

(B) DC cannot afford to raise revenues by raising taxes, and shouldn't halt business tax reductions.
(N) DC can increase revenues by increasing residential densities, commercial zoning, fewer exemptions.

(B) DC cannot control its spending: virtually none is "discretionary", but does need to improve accountability.
(N) Technical term "discretionary" misused; spending dictated by persistently high poverty level.

(B) DC cannot count on improving bureaucratic efficiency since no one knows how much DC wastes.
(N) Most 'benchmark' comparisons show poor efficiency; report fails to recommend applying them.

(B) Five rationales are offered for permanent, reliable, incentive-free payments of up to $660M annually.
(N) Options by which Congress could readily assure higher DC revenues, lower costs are not shown.

NARPAC believes the only reason for a yearly federal payment is as token penance for Congressional failure to fulfill its responsibilities to level metro area playing fields for DC and other inner cities.

November, 2002

On November 5th, the voters of the nation's capital city elected the mayor and Council to another term. Before inauguration day in January, 2003, the mayor, his top aides, and the Council should take some quality time to decide how to create a new Act II, not just prolong or repeat Act I

Act I has initiated many fundamental changes that assure the city's future quality of life will be much brighter than its past. But it also introduced a number of secondary characters and side shows that should no be repeated. Hosting the capitol of the world's foremost nation adds serious responsibilities not shared by other US cities, but not yet addressed. Important silent constituencies remain to be satisfied far beyond DC's local neighborhoods, frenetic activists, and racial demagogues.

Three basic themes await development. DC's ratings may rise to somewhere between 'mediocre' and 'good' without them, but cannot reach the 'outstanding' Americans want from their capital.

DC Must Accept the Role of a Prime American City: the prevalent attitude that DC should be just a conglomeration of contented, quaint, interconnected communities must change. Ignoring the larger obligations to both the federal government and all Americans across the country while pandering to the endless demands of local supplicants must stop. The federal government must be seen as a partner, not a free-loading scourge. Commuters, visitors, non- profits, embassies, and tourists must be welcomed, not resented. And business and commerce must be accepted as defining the city's financial and structural character at least as much as its often parochial 'middle class' residents. This nation's capital city must be a whale of a lot more than a collection of neighborhoods.

DC Must Enhance Its Leadership Role as the Core City of a Thriving Metro Area:regional cooperation and comprehensive long-range planning are almost non-existent. There is no meaningful area-wide plan for growth, and no agreement on the special roles for inner city, inner and outer suburbs. There is no credible area transportation plan, no plan to emphasize growth around its world-class metrorail system; no plan for the productive re-use of surplus government properties; and no plans for sharing the regional burdens of poverty, health, and education. The District, by its acquiescence keeps getting smaller, poorer, sicker, and dumber than its suburbs. It must stimulate Congress to grasp the bigger picture and help level the local, regional and federal playing fields.

DC Must Alleviate Its Poverty, Not Just Accommodate It: the city must provide the poor with the basic essentials of American life. But the fundamental goal must be to break the self- perpetuating cycle of poverty caused by the cycle of ignorance. Long-term institutional mechanisms must be developed to "recycle" those kids-turned-parents who lack the minimum education required for self sufficiency, much less for raising kids that can learn their way to success. DC will never excel with less than10% of the area's taxpayers, but over 30% of its hard- core poor, and a bloated municipal bureaucracy struggling to tend to their needs.

NARPAC urges DC leaders to build on their current successes and expand their horizons.

October, 2002

DC's development momentum continues unabated, despite losing its bid for the Olympics. The new Convention Center is almost finished, the Carnegie Library is becoming the city's museum. Some 100 development projects are underway in an expanding "downtown". Georgetown U. is expanding, the new George Washington Hospital is open. The WWII Memorial is underway on the Mall, two luxury hotels have opened near the renovated Washington Monument. Plans are progressing for the major Anacostia Waterfront Initiative, the old DC General campus, and the Southwest Waterfront.

Navy Yard revitalization is almost complete and construction is underway on the nearby Maritime Plaza and Southeast Business Center. 'Big box' stores are coming to Northeast. The Green Line is open. Sites for a new baseball stadium are under review. Metro's modest new 10-year plan will expand its rail and bus systems further into the suburbs and around the city. East of the Anacostia, 10,000 low and moderately priced homes are abuilding or occupied, including a fifth new Hope VI housing project. Parts of St. Elizabeth's hospital campus will soon become available for redevelop-ment. The development cart is rolling along apace.

But DC's antiquated comprehensive development plan dates back to 1985. It has platitudes for every advocacy from trees and bicycles to historic sites and monuments, but no quantitative guidance for how the city should grow within its fixed boundaries over the next 20 years. Officials hope the central city will "keep up" with its suburbs, while 'smart growth' assures higher core density. Higher density should produce greater use of public transportation, shared common spaces, and focus around metro stations. Protecting open spaces, neighborhoods, and unobstructed views of the skies is promised.

There are goals to preserve outdated structures for posterity, add urban avenues that discourage through traffic, and keep building height limits that defy the laws of economics, while using tax subsidies to bribe residents and businesses to move into the nation's capital. Residents are sought over businesses. There are no preferential zones for economic development beyond downtown, and no long-term plans to provide the needed transportation infrastructure. DC schools plan separately from the rest of the city. DC and Federal lands are planned separately, and neither plans cooperatively with the rest of the metro area. The planning horse is well behind the cart, and stumbling.

Furthermore, those directly involved in approving land use have no responsibility for DC's financial integrity. New property uses are not correlated with the costs they may incur or the revenues they may produce. The squeakiest wheels in the increasingly decentralized approval process have no interest or voice in the budget process. Activists for environment, history, sociology, aesthetics, and community all vie for the last word on how to use each property, but shun issues of poverty, taxing or servicing. There is no broad-based analysis of the city's needs or goals within the executive branch, and noone in the legislative branch seems to mind. The sickly planning horse is unbridled.

The next Williams Administration sorely needs to institute a modern urban planning process.

September, 2002

Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge yesterday urged officials of DC, Maryland and Virginia to increase preparations for a possible major terrorist attack in or near the nation's capital.... saying "clearly, today there is nothing more important"....Ridge's call for action came as DC Mayor Williams, Virginia Gov. Mark Warner, and Maryland Gov. Parris Glendening signed an eight-point agreement committing their governments to improving regional coordination during emergencies, a system that federal officials say they hope will become a national model. Mayor Williams responded that "we all recognize that we're probably the most complex government operating environment in the world, certainly in the country.....if we can make it work here, we can make it work anywhere."
(Washington Post 8/6/02: Ridge Tells Area to Unite Efforts Against Terror)

There is an old saw that "the best is the enemy of the good", i.e., that striving too hard to achieve perfection can delay or prevent good things from emerging meanwhile. Likewise, striving too hard to avoid the very worst imaginable can delay or prevent curing the bad things already here.

Current preoccupation with barely possible devastating attacks by foreign zealots is deflecting attention from serious local, regional, and national problems already eroding our domestic quality of life. Somehow it seems easier (and certainly less embarrassing) to be indignant about what others might do to us, than face up to what we are already doing to ourselves. Pogo knew better.

How can we leap so quickly to the obvious conclusion that we should improve regional cooperation and develop a national model response system to long-shot emergencies, while refusing to adopt regional cooperation or develop a national model to resolve the urban blight in some of America's most prestigious metro areas, including its national capital metro area?

Dispassionate observers would give no better than one-in-a-thousand odds for a major attack against the nation's capital in the next year. At the same time, we know with 100% certainty that the core city of the DC metro area is being threatened right now. With 12% of the area's population, and, 8% of its collective wealth, DC sustains 29% of the area's poor families and 22% of its crime, despite 35% of its police. And with 10% of the area's kids, DC has 20% of its single parents, 16% of its poor kids, 15% of its disabled kids, 15% of its teen-aged births, and 17% of out of wedlock births. DC also has more than its share of foster kids, mental patients, high school drop-outs, miserable SAT scores, functionally illiterate adults, racial demagogues, and incarcerated males.

This ever-present threat from concentrated poverty cannot be defeated by conjuring up foreign devils, spying on our neighbors, planning evacuations, or stockpiling inoculations. It require serious and cooperative long-term efforts from all the overlapping governmental jurisdictions right here in the DC metro area, from Congress to each local council.

Shouldn't someone tell the national capital area to unite against its ongoing internal threats?

FORMULA FOR MEDIOCRITY: When Leaders Settle for Playing the Hand They've Been Dealt
August, 2002

"It is not obvious that DC will embrace accountability with open arms and necessary comprehension. It is obvious that without it, DC government performance will remain somewhere between total dysfunction and embarrassing mediocrity." (NARPAC editorial, 9/00)

"In response to a complaint about DC's continued police ineptness, the Deputy Police Chief replied that yes, DC police personnel were often 'hopeless', but that 'we have to play the hand we've been dealt'". ('themail' 6/23/02)

Hardly a week goes by without reports of frustrating or embarrassing personnel problems in DC's government, from department heads to rank and file members. Some criticisms reach hysterical proportions, but the underlying implications of incompetent performance cannot be dismissed. And DC still employs far more personnel per capita than neighboring counties or comparable inner cities, paying them more to boot. One can only conclude that this mayor and his top aides are by choice still playing the hand their predecessors dealt them in 1999.

It would be easy to stretch the Deputy Chief's defensive remark too far. But fears that city leaders are still gambling with the city's future reputation; still playing a game defined by others; still using a deck that was stacked by others, with cards marked by others; and still being trumped by wild cards (most likely race cards) cannot easily be dismissed. The implication is clear: DC leadership has not declared its own game, chosen its own dealer, or demanded a new deck.

Whatever happened to early promises to: use benchmarking to show comparative governmental efficiency? set ambitious 'Scorecard' performance goals? revise job descriptions for civil servants? privatize bureaucratically incompetent offices? The CFO still cites so-called "budget pressures" to justify overspending in the same old areas. Annual salary awards still go to agency heads with flawed public records. City commissions continue to make dubious, high-handed decisions. Planning efforts still pander to the loudest squeaks, not the city's best interests. DC Council members accuse Congress of "not understanding the culture of DC residents."

Nevertheless, improvements in the city's physical appearance; investments in commercial and residential construction; and infrastructure modernization are all continuing and accelerating. The mayor is running for re-election essentially unopposed, (despite a very stupid re-election campaign staff and black leaders' dubious claims he has neglected the poor). Even a majority of black residents see development as a good thing. How to reconcile the two?

Evidently, most Washingtonians do not expect much from their local government. They will tolerate or accept incompetence to satisfy other lifestyle demands. People seldom choose where to settle based on the professionalism of city services, as long as some minimum standards are met . If they're not, most Americans move, or pay for needed services privately. Parents may migrate towards better schools, but nobody moves just to find a better DMV.

In fact, DC's most affluent are indifferent to city services, many of which go to those with the least socioeconomic mobility who must accept whatever they can get. Those services are delivered by some of DC's so-called middle class who lack the cultural heritage to do their city jobs well, but who are evidently at no risk of losing them. It is a formula for mediocrity. DC city service delivery may gradually improve just enough to avoid being a national embarrassment, but at the current rate, it will never reach the threshold of national pride.

MIXING 21ST CENTURY RELIGION AND POLITICS: Crossing the Lines, Globally and Locally
July, 2002

The early years of the 21st Century are demonstrating increasing interference from various religions in the political quest for a peaceful, prosperous world. Muslim extremists are out to crush the most successful socioeconomic system in recorded history. Jewish extremists want no conciliation with the Arab world. Catholics are showing that they don't always practice what they preach or support civil law. The Christian right wing would return America to isolation. And American black churches seem more preoccupied with perpetuating the black/white schism than inspiring the moral motivation needed for their own socioeconomic salvation.

The permanent poor in the US are predominantly black. Immigrants of all races and colors flood into the US and work their way into the American lifestyle within a generation or two. But the black are not poor because of the color of their skin. They are poor because so many of them are school drop-outs and have remained undereducated. They drop out in large measure because their teenage pregnancy rate is so high and their rate of marriage is so low. Two-thirds of black kids have at best only one parent, heavily stacking the deck against breaking the cycle of their poverty.

In our nation's capital, black political leaders are primarily black church leaders. And they are complaining that DC's black mayor has not done enough to alleviate black poverty. But DC's current mayor surely does not encourage black promiscuity, discourage black family cohesion, or belittle black family values. Morality is really none of his political business. His thankless task is to raise enough revenues from rich residents and businesses to pay for the consequences of unwed mothers spending a lifetime in poverty, partially illiterate, and begetting kids disadvantaged in every respect by their uniquely bad circumstances and lack of inspiration. Almost 70% of DC's budget goes to support the problems of the poor which the city government did not cause and cannot rectify. A recent study (unconfirmed by NARPAC) estimates that DC spends $750M of its $5.3B budget on the consequences of teen pregnancies alone.

There is no esoteric quandary here over which comes first, the poor chicken or the poor egg. The cycle of poverty can only be broken when the poor chicken consciously decides not to produce another poor egg, choosing instead to improve herself out of poverty and squalor. Neither the adamant poor nor their demagogic church leaders can pin their plight on their mayor. They can't vote or sing their way out of poverty. They must pull themselves and each other out of poverty. This requires the concerted efforts of a devoted ministry, backed up with the assistance of a compassionate mayor. They've got the latter. Where's the former?

CONGRESS MUST REDEFINE NATIONAL WELFARE THIS YEAR: How about Redefining the Welfare of the Nation's Capital City Too?
June, 2002

Congress must re-enact major federal welfare legislation this year. The current Administration is sure to shift towards greater state control of federal grants. Several programs may be combined and modified to fit the needs as seen at the state level. While Democrats may disagree on some particulars, greater state autonomy seems assured.

The DC government is applying pressure this year to restore an annual Federal payment, asserting that the city cannot reliably continue to pay its own bills. At the same time, DC is also lobbying for the same voting representation in the House and Senate that states now enjoy. These two demands are incongruous. Both Congress and DC can do better.

The more important of the two demands is that DC residents get representation of some kind in the US Congress. But Congress does impose several constraints on DC's financial stability that pre-date any federal welfare program. It is high time for Congress to help encourage DC's self- sufficiency. This requires two distinct but related Congressional initiatives:

1. Assist the District in developing new revenue sources of its own:

o remove arbitrary legislative prohibitions which constrain the District from producing sufficient revenues to provide necessary services at costs comparable with those of its suburbs;

o empower the National Capital Planning Commission to seek and implement plans for enhancing the economic productivity of all federal capital area properties, and for turning over to DC for financially productive uses those that are surplus to current and foreseen federal needs;

o expand the use of federal agency funds to defray demonstrable costs of hosting the federal presence, and for city projects clearly intended to maintain and enhance DC's national posture.

2. Oblige metro area cooperation in providing DC "virtual state support":

o eliminate obvious conflicts of interest on the four DC oversight subcommittees which keep the Washington metro area from acting cooperatively to level the regional playing field;

o elevate the focus of Congressional oversight to matters impacting the overall success of our national capital metro area and perhaps other metro areas with similar socioeconomic inequities;

o require the surrounding state and local jurisdictions to assure that those regional residents needing the most government assistance are not forced to concentrate in the inner city;

o use regional federal grants to help equalize sorely needed improvements in affordable housing, transportation, health, and public education for kids and adults.

May, 2002

Parents often create boogeymen to control the behavior of their kids. Kids make up outlandish tales to explain their failure to do as they are told. Grown-ups create scapegoats to deflect blame from themselves. But let's face it, kids are not permanently disfigured by making funny faces; dogs never eat homework; and DC's tenuous financial condition is not caused by the Federal presence.

The current phrase de jour is the "structural imbalance" supposedly imposed on DC by its unique status as the nation's capital. The 'imbalance' is said to result from DC residents' need for services that exceeds their willingness to pay for them (compared to other US citizens). It is said to be 'structural' because the root causes are declared to be beyond the victims' control.

The term was developed by Carol O'Cleireacian, nurtured by Alice Rivlin, formalized in the Mayor's annual address and budget books, certified by McKinsey & Co. consultants, beatified by the Federal City Council, and now reflected in Delegate E. H. Norton's proposed Congressional legislation.

This mantra claims DC should be reimbursed for losing $100-200M in property taxes not collected on federal properties (e.g., the Capitol building), non-profit institutions (e.g., the National Cathedral), foreign entities (e.g, the British Embassy), or thousands of acres of federal park land (e.g., the Mall), and over $400M in income taxes from 400,000 commuting workers. It claims $200M (way too high) in un-reimbursed services to federal entities (e.g., ambulances, police protection), and $100M in "state services" not required of other core cities (e.g., education, insurance regulation).

Even if these dubious estimates were correct, NARPAC believes large permanent federal payments will perpetuate the real problems, not cure them. Prescribed remedies are useless if the illness is incorrectly diagnosed, dangerous if other maladies are made worse. The ends must drive the means.

DC's basic illness is not diagnosed in this myth. Big federal payments are not the ends. The imbalance is rooted in what makes DC per capita services expenditures so much higher and less affordable than in nearby counties. Too many DC residents are poor. Too little DC land yields net revenues. The poor generate high demands for services, resist economic development, and are inefficiently tended by local municipal workers. These reflect in lower per capita property, income, and sales tax revenues, and higher per capita government costs than any other jurisdiction in the metro area.

Despite 12% of the region's population, and 14% of its households, DC's tax base includes only 8% of the region's household income, and 3% of its housing value to serve 29% of its poor families. If our national capital was re-located to Montgomery or Fairfax Counties, they would have no structural imbalance. DC's financial problems would be infinitely worse, and home rule even less practical.

The solutions lie in a) regional sharing of the burden of caring for and lessening poverty, and b) the ceding, swapping, or converting of a few hundred poorly used city and federal acres to highly productive local use. These means work towards honest ends. Renewed federal hand-outs do not.

April, 2002

Now that the Bush White House is classifying the status of its worst threats by five colors, it is time to pronounce the Washington metro area's future transportation outlook to be at CODE ORANGE. Neither the financially-strapped inner city nor its flush suburbs are facing up to the straight-forward problem of allocating public funds to public needs. Throwing money at the usual targets may not allay the urban socioeconomic problems of poverty, ill-health and crime that flow from inadequate public education. But assuring sensible, efficient growth in the region's transportation capacity takes only serious planning and the political guts to steadily allocate the moderate fiscal resources needed. Instead, elected officials at all levels have abrogated their responsibilities, pandered to taxpayers, and frittered away the nation's greatest economic boom.

The Federal Government is cutting back transportation funding to make room for dubious increases in military spending, while doing nothing to stanch the guzzling by oversized personal vehicles. The Congress is threatening to discontinue essential passenger rail service, and bickering with local authorities over the investment costs of needed highway bridges and interchanges, while ignoring basic needs for railroad infrastructure. It continues to deny DC the right to tax its 400,000+ commuters, while wasting scarce funds to re-name National Airport.

Neither Virginia nor Maryland have yet accepted the need for major new highways and bridges to reduce the overloaded Beltway around DC, or for rolling back inappropriate tax breaks. Virginia lawmakers have denied local jurisdictions the right to hold a referendum to increase taxes to unclog their own roads, and are trying to link vastly different education and transportation funding needs.

Washington's metro region is expanding rapidly, but the increasing funding needs for an aging Metro rail and bus system are being largely ignored, with no dedicated revenue sources to de- politicize the annual funding process. Meanwhile, new programs are caught in a debate between light rail, heavy rail, and various cheaper, more flexible, bus modernization schemes.

DC itself remains inattentive to its local and intermodal parking needs (and car-towing scams); is only now setting up a separate transportation department (to match MD and VA); and is perpetuating a visitor-unfriendly taxi-metering system. It wants the federal government to underwrite its road infrastructure (and school facilities modernization); can't find room for its commercial bus station at its handsome railroad station; can't agree to re-zone areas around its metro stations for high-density, high-revenue growth; and can't settle on permanent sites for modern trash-transfer facilities. It is slow to accept air-rights developments atop its highways and railroad yards; and has only just begun to toy with Metro rail expansion for further essential urban development.

The sound development of the nation's capital metro area is at far greater risk from inattention to its long-range transportation needs than from the heinous acts of a few deranged terrorists.

March, 2002

Urban public school systems are confronted with kids performing below expectations. Parents, school boards, superintendents, teachers, and elected officials point fingers at each other and demand instant improvements. DC went through this a few years ago. Neighboring Prince George's County is going through it now. Even the more fortunate Montgomery County school system has plunged into introspection and self-doubt because its standardized test scores do not always produce identical, upward-sloping test results.

NARPAC has pondered this problem since its incorporation, because the city's most embarrassing statistics are generated by those who are now in, once passed through, or dropped out of, DC's public schools. High crime rates, jobless rates, teen pregnancies, special ed rates, plus poor health statistics, low birth weights, literacy rates, and immunization rates, all derive from native Washingtonians, not from some uncontrolled influx of illegal aliens from Maryland or Virginia.

performance statistics from various schools within a single school system generally demonstrate two trends. First, there is substantial "scatter" between schools with almost identical student populations, indicating that individual school managements can surely influence their "output" but only within limits. Second, there is a more basic trend line through the scatter points indicating that the poorer the kids' families, the poorer the average kid's test scores will be. And this trend overwhelms the "scatter". The best schools at the bottom of the poverty (subsidized meal) scale produce lower test scores than the worst schools at the top of the affluence scale.

But parents don't pay for their kids' public education, so why is there any correlation with wealth at all? Some of the most legendary urban schools have crumbling facilities, barely paid teachers, and sparkling kids. Furthermore, pumping money into school systems seldom shows dramatic changes in output measures. The ability to teach is the primary domain of the school. The desire to learn is the primary domain of the household. How does poverty inhibit the ambition to learn?

Various Census statistics show incontrovertible evidence of two direct correlations between poverty and household potential. One is whether there are two adult householders providing strength and income for the family, or only one. The other is the strong relationship between householder income and the householder's own educational achievement Those with college degrees produce almost 5 times the income of those led by grade school drop-outs. Poverty indicators, then, seems to be measuring both the ability of parents to earn and their kids to learn.

Hence, high correlation trend lines can be drawn between kids' test scores and their parents' combined education level. Leave the poverty out of the equation. Moreover, those trend lines appear indistinguishable between the races. Leave race out of the equation. Match the parents' skills and ambitions, match their kids' success. Period.

IMPROVING DC HOUSING , Progress with Risk
February, 2002

The Mayor's vision for DC starts out as follows: "...our citizens deserve the best city in America. That means: strong schools, safe streets, affordable housing, and reliable transportation;..." The DC Council has taken a significant step to improve housing availability, particularly at the lower end of the income scale. The Housing Preservation, Rehabilitation, and Production Omnibus Amendment Act of 2001, proposed by the mayor and introduced in the Council on March 30, 2001 by Chairperson Cropp, was passed into DC law on January 8th, 2002. It is called the first significant housing legislation passed in DC in two decades, and hailed by the mayor as a "comprehensive package of reforms and incentives to spur the production of housing in DC for people of all incomes". Its goals include preserving some 2700 units of affordable housing, and building or rebuilding 4300 units of housing for extremely low-, low- and moderate-income families.

To the extent that this bill hastens the removal of thousands of derelict properties, and provides better living conditions for DC's more disadvantaged residents, it is a welcome step in the right direction. The city is certainly obliged to do what it can to improve the quality of life for its many low income residents, and encourage them to move up the economic ladder and shift from renters to homeowners. It also provides tax incentives for developers to build more upscale housing units within DC, as long as some of them are available to those needing "affordable" housing.

The flip side of this worthy effort is that households making below $50K often rent and seldom generate enough in income, sales, and property taxes to pay their own costs in services. Attracting more residents in this category would be counterproductive. Renters seek to minimize their costs while homeowners try to maximize their investment. It takes 30 households in the $20-30K income bracket to pay the personnel costs for just one teacher, and 17 households in the $30-50K bracket to pay for just one cop on the beat. It could easily take ten low income households to pay for the one in seven DC kids in special ed. 70% of DC households report incomes below $50K. They provide less than 20% of the city's residential tax revenues which, in turn, make up only half the city's total locally raised revenues.

DC has a strong obligation to improve the lot of its own least fortunate. It has no mandate to embrace any more of the region's poor not already residing in the District. There is nothing apparent in this Housing Bill that restricts its benefits to those already living (and probably renting) in DC. Furthermore, there is no equivalent housing legislation in DC's wealthier surrounding jurisdictions aimed at improving the lot of their own poor who have been more and more squeezed by the recent economic boom.

If the unintended consequence of this well-meaning initiative is to increase the number of DC residents who do not pay their own way, it will be a disaster.

2001 in WASHINGTON, D.C. A TALE OF TWO CITIES AT WAR (As Viewed from the Bleachers)
January, 2002

Shortly after the human missile attacks on New York's World Trade Center, the President declared war on global terrorism and sharply changed the domestic and international agendae. Casting aside his somewhat contentious domestic plans, President Bush asserted the primacy of Homeland Defense, downgraded civil liberties, froze alleged abettors' assets, indefinitely confined suspected collaborators, and suppressed criticism in the name of patriotism. With strong international support and a willing Congress, the Commander in Chief of the World's most capable military forces unleashed the B-52s, smart bombs, and target-designating special forces on horseback. The initial results of American might and technology were spectacular, destroying Afghanistan's externally-supported fundamentalist government, and pulverizing supposedly impregnable mountain cave complexes within 100 days. Moderate collateral damage was shrugged off as an inescapable consequence of a just war soon to be expanded elsewhere abroad.

Meanwhile, back in the nation's capital city, home to some 575,000 partially disenfranchised citizens, DC's mayor continued to pursue his urban revitalization efforts with little Federal or White House support, marginal regional cooperation, and a petty--often partisan--Council. The mayor has no license to ignore human rights, innocent bystanders or partisan critics. He faces an economy fallen victim to homeland insecurity, threatening the first budget deficit in five years. With little Executive charisma, a fumbling bureaucracy and no Legislative statesmen, Mayor Williams continued his domestic wars on nine fronts, making limited progress at best on a few of them. The War on Evildoers did not cause his failings, but surely provided no substantive aid.

The War Against Colonialism made symbolic, but fruitless progress;

The War Against Crime barely held its ground statistically and lost public confidence;

The War Against Poverty lifted only a very few hardcore unemployed off welfare;

The War Against Bad Health continued to show little basic advancement;

The War Against Ignorance showed real signs of progress, at least within the school system;

The War Against Urban Blight also made considerable progress;

The War Against Pollution gained an historic Anacostia River pact between DC and Maryland;

The War Against Urban Sprawl remained a losing game without a regional strategy;

The War Against Local Bureaucracy proved to be one of the most intractable.

Could Mayor Williams win these wars with bureaucrats as well trained and disciplined as the US military? Could he be more effective against universally certified "enemies" with popular backing approaching patriotic fervor? Could he benefit by suppressing civil rights and challenging his suburban "allies" to either contribute or be classified hostile? Could he move faster by ignoring the federal government, Congress, and special interest activists? Could he do better if Americans realized that the real threats to the fabric of their future life come from inside our borders and inside our cities? Could most big US city mayors benefit from a display of heroics from the White House? Does Homeland Security involve a great deal more than myopic focus on international terrorism? NARPAC firmly believes so.

NOTE: a fully expanded version of this assessment can be found here

STUCK ON THE BACKSIDE OF THE POWER CURVE Ever More Resources, Ever Slower Progress
December, 2001

Despite the headwinds produced by the 9/11 storm and a still-gathering recession, our nation's capital city is still moving towards a more modern and bustling city, though the flight is getting bumpier. Mayor Williams admits that DC is "only one crisis away from financial trouble", and both Maryland and Virginia are throttling back their budget expenditures. Public resources are dropping just when more are needed to avoid stalling out the area's long-term growth plan.

Assuring the long-range financial well-being of the city requires generating substantially more revenues within its limited space. DC has found no practical way to reduce the costs of its unusually large population of poor people or of city workers who support them. District officials are now urging the Congress to restore an annual federal payment to supplement DC's own revenues. This is tantamount to a permanent citywide welfare payment, even as it struggles to get a large number of individual welfare recipients off the dole.

A far better long-term solution would be for DC to develop the means for permanent self- sufficiency without evicting its disadvantaged, or depending on federal handouts. The entire metro area's economic stability requires cooperative long-range land-use planning, and long- range regional transportation planning consistent with it. It has neither.

During the past decade of ever-increasing prosperity, the decisions needed to bolster the region's economic growth through better land use and transportation infrastructure have been avoided or delayed. The backlog of funds required to maintain the current road, rail, and bridge infrastructure have grown. The transportation system costs required to keep viable the current growth both downtown and across the region have grown substantially, exceeding the region's willingness to pay.

The Wilson Bridge is years late, there are no planned "outer beltways", additional Potomac crossings, or regional connectors. Billions are required to add to public transportation in areas already saturated by their own prosperity (viz., New Blue Metro Line).Little funding or interest is left to develop new areas with high economic potential (viz. DC East of the Anacostia). New smart growth is being shelved to rescue past dumb growth (viz the standoff between the long- planned Purple Subway Line and the more expedient Purple Trolley Line). New projects are being undertaken without any underlying regional economic foundation (viz., the Anacostia Waterfront Initiative).

It is essential, even during this period of rough weather, to generate a long-range, achievable flight plan for when clear skies return. To remain unprepared will put in jeopardy our ability to reach our desired destination. The City Council, the Regional Council of Governments, and/or the US Congress should make sure America's capital does not fall short of its evident potential.

AMERICA'S CAPITAL CITY AT WAR -- Symbol of Strength or Proof of Weakness?
November, 2001

On September 11, a few dedicated terrorists improvised on instruments of our free lifestyle to deliver a few huge smart bombs with a remarkable precision. The Pentagon can barely match such accuracy after 30 years of development and an annual defense budget larger than the combined GNP of Afghanistan, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Pakistan, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.

A few weeks later, one or two other twisted malcontents used the World's most efficient mail service to deliver potentially lethal germs to a Congressional leader with a variety of probably unintended side-effects. Any number of additional instruments of our 'normal' lifestyle can be turned against us. But these few fiendish acts have already damaged what no prior American enemy had touched: our confidence in our own personal security.

Like Americans everywhere, Washingtonians are discovering the hidden costs of unlimited personal freedom and unfettered prosperity. But unlike Americans elsewhere, DC citizens are more likely to be the target of future terrorist acts. Will their reactions accurately represent American fortitude to the world's observers including its evildoers?

DC's urban, government-focused demography is far from the American norm. It is long on poor minorities susceptible to demagoguery, and short on middle-class entrepreneurs accustomed to risk-taking. It is long on people trying to influence others, but short on permanent, tax-paying homeowners. So how must the city cope with unexpected insecurity?

At the personal level, residents must accept greater intrusions into their private lives and uncommon constraints on their beloved civil rights. They must develop more personal responsibility, accept more government authority, and support family solidarity. They must avoid over-reacting to misplaced media hyperbole, resist contributing to false alarms, and reject practical jokes. They must stay alert and focus on their responsibilities.

At the community level, neighborhoods must resist racial biases excited by demagogues and bigots. They must focus less on special interests and more on common interests and fears. They must be patient with local and federal government struggling with strange new circumstances. They must depend less on--and make fewer petty demands on-- government services.

At the economic level, households must cope with a much tighter economy and considerably higher unemployment. Workers will have to try to offset the loss in productivity due to heightened security, and adapt to demands for different workforce skills. There is no reason to expect a large increase in federal work force to prosecute a war against evildoers.

These challenges are substantial but not insurmountable. But DC must recognize it has national as well as local obligations: DC must Think Smarter, Live Smarter, and Work Smarter.

NEW DEMANDS ON THE NATION'S CAPITAL CITY -- Ground Zero in The First Holy War of The 21st Century?
October, 2001

On September 11,2001 , a handful of the world's ultimate activists escalated their holy war against the Great Satan by killing about 5000 Americans and 1000 foreign nationals in the space of two hours at two of America's most prominent icons. They used almost entirely American assets and modalities. All they had to provide for themselves was a knowledge of our way of life, and a willingness-if not an eagerness--to die to destroy it.

Never mind that this tragedy could have been avoided had we taken the same precautions as others who have lived with terrorism for years. Never mind that different American leadership might have responded differently. Never mind that the chances of accomplishing what the White House and the Congress have set out to do are slim at best. Never mind that we have not won prior open-ended sociological wars like those against poverty, drugs, or drunk driving. Nor has any religion rid the world of its version of evil.

The US has essentially declared an open-ended 'take-no-prisoners' holy war against the most fervent of the world's fringe ideologies. It has committed to taking as-yet undefined actions against up to16 countries-most of whose ways we cannot understand, languages we cannot speak, and poverty we cannot imagine. It has done so with only the tenuous endorsement of many of the world's leaders and multinational or global organizations. The US asserts it will make whatever sacrifices are required of our wealth, youth, and life style for as long as it takes--mentioning time frames as long as three presidential and five Congressional elections. Will even our adversaries take that seriously?

Meanwhile, will things change in the nation's capital city? Will suicidal fanatics target DC again as a symbol of American strength and/or debauchery? Will others increase the false alarm rate? Will government bureaucrats continue to overreact? NARPAC says yes.

Will the forces of evil relent? Will Congress and the Executive Branch permit DC to plan the city's heightened security? Can such increased caution avoid impacting on DC's economy? Will business and tourist visits return to 'pre-war' levels? Will this unique 'wartime economy' substantially increase DC's resident or working population? Does the August federal or local legislative agenda still pertain? NARPAC thinks not.

What then, would NARPAC like to see DC's government and activists do?

o Focus more on long-term citywide imperatives, like transportation and growth goals;

o Focus on improving partnership status with the Feds, Congress, and the metro area;

o Prepare for negative revenue growth and a slow-down in commercial revitalization;

o Increase demands for revenue- and poverty-sharing with the suburbs;

o Shelve any fantasies of greater political autonomy or statehood right now; and

o Avoid counterproductive histrionics over perceived threats to civil liberties.

VERY GOOD NEWS FOR THE DCPS CLASS OF 2010--But What about the Class of 1990?
September, 2001

Nothing much seemed to happen when Superintendent Vance took over DC's Public School System with a one-year caretaker agreement. But now, a year later. actions are being taken that could change the nature of the schools and of the nation's capital city itself. Vance, who now has a 3-year contract, a new Chief of Staff, and the total approval of the new school board, the mayor, the Council, and the Control Board, has begun flexing his muscles.

Over 400 teachers have been removed and 30-odd principals replaced for cause. Vance has singled out 9 schools for complete management overhaul: Ward 8's Simon Elementary, for example, is getting an 80% change in personnel including 60% new teachers. Ground has been broken for the first two schools in the ambitious new modernization plan. A new procurement system is in the offing. Most important, Vance's new "Business Plan for Strategic Reform" with concerned citizen input is nearing completion and is expected to remain his permanent guide.

The plan sets forth a clear intent to "address problems systemically rather than trying to fix one component without addressing its causes and dependents". Concrete evidence of this intent appears in a key new pilot program: 24 schools will offer a full range of city social services from counseling and health care to emergency food aid. Board President Cafritz asserts that the goal is for DCPS and the DC government (through the Deputy Mayor for Children, Youth, and Families) to provide a "seamless web of support for our children" across all relevant DC agencies.

NARPAC sees this school year as the start of a major revolution in DC's public schools. It is very good news for the Class of 2010 probably the first to benefit substantially from the new reforms. However, while these reforms are clearly necessary, they are surely insufficient. Most of the least successful past output of the DCPS is still nearby, producing its future inputs and environment. Think about it:

Since 1980, some 150,000 kids have entered DCPS, over 70% eligible for breakfast/lunch subsidies. Less than 60,000 have persisted to the 12th Grade, with 40,000 dropping out during High School. 200,000 kids have been born , over 125,000 out of wedlock, and 35,000 to mothers below the age of 20. 3600 died in infancy, and over 30,000 have required special ed many for life. 75,000 boys in this cohort have been in trouble with the law, with 40,000 still incarcerated. More than 10,000 DC employees tend to the needs of families below the poverty line.

If these DCPS drop-outs were PCB's, empty beer cans, or defective products, they would be "remediated", recycled, or recalled. As trapped humans, however, many are simply the parents of the Class of 2010, or the grandparents of the Class of 2015, perpetuating the cycle of failure outside the immediate purview of the school system.

The DCPS Business Plan cannot be deemed complete until it helps to break that cycle. It must reclaim the Classes of 1980 through 2005 by such means as adult and vocational education. Schools cannot assure DC kids' success as long as their home environment fails them.

TIME FOR THE "V-WORD"AT LAST?--Let the Vision Debate Begin!
August, 2001

In mid-July, the Greater Washington Research Program of the Brookings Institution released a report by two well-known "urban economists", Alice Rivlin and Carol O'Cleireacain. Entitled "Envisioning a Future Washington", it hopes to "stimulate vigorous debate and discussion about the District's future and its role in the Greater Washington Region." NARPAC has long urged such introspection.

To his credit, the Mayor's Vision was outlined in his 'strategic plan' in his first year in office. It was intended to "give voice to our shared vision for the city, and to empower citizens to improve their communities." The mayor retains this vision, and is clearly working to implement it. NARPAC damned it with faint praise, declaring it "necessary but not sufficient" as an ultimate vision for the nation's capital city.

Now the "strawman" Rivlin vision expands on the mayor's goals, keeping the major focus on neighborhoods, and increasing resident population as the only available means of increasing city revenues for urban revitalization. It visualizes 100,000 more residents in about 55,000 more households (22%), half of them producing 25,000 more students (32%) enrolled in public schools, the rest producing revenues. The authors suggest targeting certain neighborhoods for growth, avoiding gentrification, but attracting a key "anchor institution" to each to provide jobs and assistance. Increased public transportation capacity is posited but with fewer commuters and less traffic congestion. Closer ties with the suburbs are foreseen, and an annual Federal payment to DC for service costs incurred. Increased annual revenues of about 5% are visualized. NARPAC commends this effort for stressing "productivity" -- i.e., assessing whether various options produce more in revenues than they consume in service costs. We agree with several of its other goals, but still find it well short of a practical end state.

NARPAC's Vision is quite different, based largely on quantitative analysis, but not lightly offered. It sets DC in the context of its metro area and its unique role of hosting the nation's capital the only attribute that assures its prosperity. It favors commercial growth over residential growth for greater economic stability. It places primary emphasis on reducing DC's overload of high-cost poor families by instituting poverty-sharing with its suburbs in "anchor communities". It sees much slower residential growth, with continuing decline in public school enrollment. It stresses re-zoning for higher density growth near metro stations, and increasing the revenue potential from presently untaxed DC land. Growth is founded on a comprehensive regional transportation plan, with an expanding metro system, particularly across the Anacostia River and into Southern Maryland. A 25% revenue increase is projected. Neighborhoods would be clustered into 24 (nominal) "townships", each represented in a new bicameral Council, and each with productivity goals and modest taxing power. Congressional oversight would be very different.

It is past time to engage this debate using more factual data than societal romanticism. NARPAC is ready to participate whenever and wherever interested parties gather.

July, 2001

DC enjoyed an unusually beautiful Spring this year, and the inescapable signs of economic revival continue to blossom all over our nation's capital city. But the continuing daily reminders of the failures of its recalcitrant bureaucracy raise doubts about the soundness of local government. Some activists are demanding more local governmental autonomy, while others are striving to overturn virtually every decision made by DC's elected (and appointed) officials. But there is precious little energy from DC's legislature, electorate, city elders, self-appointed grand- standers or omniscient pundit corps--directed towards resolving the root problems of a dysfunc- tional city work force. Here are some of this Spring's embarrassing revelations:

o The GAO claims the modern financial reform systems are not and may never work;

o The FBI seizes files from the Police Union for misspending its funds;

o DC General's promised January lay-off of 500 workers was never implemented;

o DC General nurses shut down emergency care with a two-month sick-out;

o DC's IG finds $30M more in financial 'errors' at UDC in the past two years;

o DC's Tax Office finds endemic abuses of property deductions, tax payments;

o DC's Medical Examiner's backlog of cases and bodies has again risen over 1300;

o DC's Taxicab Commission lacks professionalism, judgment, and maturity;

o DPW is storing impounded cars on neighborhood streets after selling off a major lot;

o 30,000 of DCPS's 69,000 kids need summer school for 'below basic' performance;

o DCPS is planning to rebuild 40% more schools than will likely be needed;

o 76% of DC city workers are still represented by 34 local unions in 95 bargaining units;

o DCHD's latest head quits within a year already sick of "sawing wood with a hammer";

o Top mayoral aides are burning out and bailing out from the "grueling tasks of reform";

o The FY02 DC budget contains no visible efforts to streamline its bloated bureaucracy;

As this crucial year wears on, the window of opportunity to implement bureaucratic reforms will be shuttered in anticipation of next year's city elections. Vast amounts of energy and time will then be spent on hyperbole and racial demagoguery. Reform progress will be sidelined as democracy elevates self-indulgence over the common good. What will the campaign slogans be?

Is DC better off that it was four years ago? Unquestionably, yes.

But has DC yet laid the bureaucratic foundations for operating as a first class core city in the nation's pre-eminent metro area? Evidently not.

About The Future of Our National Capital City and Metro Area

June, 2001

On June 8th, the Congress will hold a joint House-Senate hearing under the auspices of the House Government Reform Oversight Subcommittee on the District of Columbia, and the Senate Government Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, Restructuring, and the District of Columbia on:

"The Outlook for the DC Government: The Post Control-Board Period"

NARPAC has studied the causes of DC's many manifest problems for 5 years, and applauded the constructive changes now underway. The Control Board has served an important role in restoring fiscal responsibility. The City's leadership has improved substantially. Fiscal solvency is virtually assured by renewed economic growth and demographic changes. But strong and confident local governance will be required from both the Council and the Mayor's Office to resolve DC's endemic bureaucratic and socioeconomic problems. New, enlightened Congressional oversight is now essential.

It is time to radically restructure Congressional oversight of DC. It is counterproductive to have four Congressional subcommittees second-guessing DC's day-to-day decisions. It is wrong to perpetuate a full four subcommittee/committee budget process when no significant appropriations are forthcoming. And it is unfair for members of Congress with obvious jurisdictional conflicts of interest to exercise that oversight.

NARPAC also believes it is essential to refocus Congressional oversight. With only 12% of the region's people, 5% of its taxpayers and 4% of its wealth, DC cannot successfully administer to over half of the region's homeless, unemployed, working poor, single moms, mentally challenged, failing students, crime victims, and incarcerated youth.

DC is the weakest link in a largely dysfunctional metro area. There is little or no sharing of the region's wealth, poverty, skilled resources, or long-range development planning, and DC cannot oblige the rest of the metro area to level the socioeconomic playing field. But these problems are not unique to DC. Many older US cities have been unable to reconcile local jurisdictional bigotry with regional cooperation--even with their own state house(s).

The clear and unique role for Congress is to encourage metro area-wide solutions to metro area-wide problems. Basic inner city/suburban disparities need to be addressed by a senior, non-partisan, policy-level committee--as economics and taxation are.

Therefore, NARPAC suggests the next Congress replace the 4-subcommittees with a Joint Committee of the Congress for US Metro Area Development and the District of Columbia.

From its broader political perspectives, Congress may prefer other approaches. But this hearing could instigate the process of finding better answers as to what metro area issues and who needs to be overseen--and by what committee with what members.

80% of Americans now live in metro areas. 100% of Americans should be proud of their national capital city. There are major, related national-level issues here without national-level attention. Some are listed below. All apply to the DC metro area. All involve federally-supported programs and assets, and ultimately, our national pride.

For the National Capital Metro Area and Others as Well

o Locating more public/affordable housing closer to where the jobs now are

o Sharing health care and medical facilities needs of the uninsured poor

o Sharing the special education needs of the disadvantaged and underemployed

o Productive use of extensive underutilized federal lands within metro areas

o Siting high-employment government facilities to benefit inner cities

o Transferring underutilized government land for local economic development

Stimulating regional plans for economic development of lagging metro sectors

o Long-range multi-modal transportation plans and trust fund uses for metro areas

o Incentives for common--competitive--regional procurement of goods and services

o Federally-authorized resource transfers to level the "socioeconomic playing field"

May, 2001

Little has happened in the nation's capital city in the past few months to raise confidence that DC can become a model core city in a model American metro area. The saga of DC General Hospital is but the most prominent of recent events suggesting that DC does not reflect the American norm among those governing or among those being governed. Why?

o The city is awash in poor, disadvantaged, and homeless people. Many seem to believe that they are governed only by their local pastors. Their demands on city revenues skew DC's budget so that it bears little resemblance to those of the more self-reliant suburbs. And they are vulnerable to demagoguery.

o The share of working residents that hold protected city or federal government jobs is unusually high, and most of them have had little or no experience in private business. A large share of resident private sector workers earn extravagant wages as lobbyists, not businessmen. An unusually small share own homes.

o Few if any core cities are as isolated from their more prosperous suburbs as DC. Cooperation is discouraged by a Congress with clear conflicts between home state and DC metro area interests; by urban emigrants wishing to escape third world inner city blight; and by local separatists still pressing for inner city statehood. The moderating influence of a majority of property owners is missing.

o As a result, the city suffers from the lack of a strong entrepreneurial middle class that embraces the classic American business work ethic and the responsibilities of American citizenship. There is little acceptance of fiscal accountability at the local level, or of the need to balance democratic rights with democratic responsibilities. The concept that more progress is made through cooperation than through obstructionism seems totally foreign to DC's legions of strident hyper-activists, many trading cynically on racism.

Against this backdrop, DC's 20-odd major elected officials (including school board) are accusing each other of not understanding the art of governing. The mayor is belittled for pandering too little, ignoring constituencies, and trying to make too many changes. The Council is charged with pandering too much, inciting racism, and ignoring the need for major changes. Residual rancor is likely to diminish progress in other key areas.

But little is said about DC's electorate and its indifference to the art of being governed. Unless and until an enlightened and positively involved electorate offers to cooperate with the people it duly elected, and obliges those officials to cooperate with each other, progress towards urban excellence is likely to fail. There is remarkable naivety about what American democracy means, and a resistance to elected authority approaching paranoia. In the case of improving DC's health care for the indigent, the DC political system failed, even though the better albeit bolder--plan has been approved.

As a recent Post editorial posits, a large segment of DC's polarized electorate is now anxious to see the Mayor's plan fail and may, in fact, be able to kill it. On the other side, the Mayor has been forced to promise more than his Health Department bureaucracy can deliver. Together, these avoidable extremes are likely to spell national embarrassment.

What is clearly needed is a set of politically acceptable safeguards by which to assure that a) the desired goals for this landmark change are being met, and b) management is ready, willing and perceptive enough--to make the inevitably needed course adjustments. This would be an ideal opportunity to convene a metro-wide watchdog advisory group of healthcare specialists charged with preventing the needless failure of this essential urban function. Somehow, the DC political system doesn't seem mature enough to create one.

April, 2001

People who analyze complex quantitative problems learn to identify the more important contributing factors that have the greater impact on the situation. Concentrating on the "first order terms" helps focus attention on the most likely solutions. Here is NARPAC's delineation of our nation's primary socioeconomic problem:

o America's primary domestic problem is the growing and unsettling rift between its richer and poorer citizens and immigrants.

o Poverty, not race or ethnicity, is the primary generator of chronic poor health care, high crime rates, and failed education--all matching 3rd World conditions.

o Poverty tends to concentrate in ghetto areas where it feeds on itself and grows, breeding despair, and counter-cultural behavior.

o Most of America's poor now live in run-down core areas of aging US metropolitan areas. Most of America's well-off live in the newer, expanding suburbs. Over 80% of all Americans live in less than 200 metro areas.

o Outdated jurisdictional boundaries within many US metro areas serve as 'filters'--pushing success outward, and pulling failure inward as the two conditions repel each other.

o Solutions to poverty require a) substantial commitments of national wealth and b) major efforts to relocate the poor into small groups closer to the roots of their salvation: community assistance, role models, training, jobs--and hope.

o The Federal Government has professed far more concern--and provided far more remedial funding--for mitigating damage to the physical environment from chemical wastes than to the social environment from wasted human lives.

o The Federal Government is, and will remain, the major source and instigation for alleviating ingrown poverty, even though the resulting programs will be better implemented by metro-specific regional authorities.

o The Federal Government has no explicit advocate for formulating metro-wide poverty-sharing programs. Congress has no committee or subcommittee, and the Executive Branch no office or agency, with "Metro Area" in its title.

o Until such metro area-related government structures are purposefully established, the major causes of American poverty, and the resulting risks of "class warfare" will continue to seriously tarnish the lustre of the American Dream.

March, 2001

As the first Williams Administration passes midpoint, the 14th session of the DC Council begins, and the 6-year term of the Control Board comes to an end, the season for self- appraisal has set in. Optimists focus on the obvious improvements in the city's economic outloook. Pessimists focus on the obvious lack of improvement in the quality of life for the city's poorest. Neither outlook is related to other US core cities, to DC's own suburbs, or to other capital cities.

The judgments appear related to some idealized version of the past, not some practical extrapolation to the future. Core cities in the post-sprawl, post-smokestack, post-welfare era simply cannot sustain the former mixes in demographics, work force, and land-use. The cities of the '40s and '50s had integral suburbs, a single revenue base, a mostly resident workforce, much larger, two-parent families, self-supporting local ethnicity--and far fewer cars;

Here are ten persistent myths about DC's future that bear little or no relation to fact:

  • DC can prosper without close linkages to the larger, wealthier parts of its metro area;
  • The city's future depends more on resuscitating its own neighborhoods than on adopting a unique and essential new role in the larger evolving metro community;
  • DC would be better off as a separate state than as the core of a cooperating region;
  • Urban neighborhoods can be restored to past glory without being 'upgraded' to embrace more prosperous, far smaller, households at a higher density;
  • Middle class house-owners generate more net city tax revenues per acre (after expenditures) than do tax-paying commercial businesses and thus are key to DC's future;
  • The Feds use up more local services than they bring in related revenues, and DC gets less total grant aid funding from Federal and State sources than do other cities;
  • DC, a core city with less than 3 taxpayers per welfare recipient, can successfully compete in quality of life with suburbs having more than 12 taxpayers per welfare recipient;
  • By adding money and teachers, DC Public Schools, with 85% of their students near or below the poverty level, can compete scholastically with suburban schools with 15% poor;
  • DC can become a first-rate city without a major new, regionally based, public/private transportation plan--including additional parking and extending metrorail;
  • The Metro system can pay for itself and limit sprawl without markedly increasing the commercial and residential density around all its metrorail stations;
As they say, in your dreams, Neighbors. None of the above statements are correct. Believing them will lower the odds of making DC a first-rate capital city in a first-rate US metro area.

Progress, sure--but toward what?
February 2001

The new year has brought several milestones in the revitalization of the District of Columbia, but removed few if any millstones from around the necks of DC residents or those who wish to take more pride in their nation's capital city. Few questions have been answered, and it remains unclear just how bright DC's future can become. Here are the top dozen milestones and their associated concerns:

o The Mayor, true to his word, published the scorecards for his senior managers, providing the first substantive indication that he plans to hold them accountable for their performance. But he gave no indication of censure for those who performed below expectations and no suggestion of a new and more challenging set of scorecards for the new year. Moreover, several persistent vacancies remain as the mayor seeks to prove the city can be rebuilt with mostly minority government administrators.

o DC's new 'hybrid' School Board has been installed, and in its first major move, has suggested adding several pet programs to the burgeoning school budget. But there are no scorecards for the Board or the Public School System managers, there has been little improvement in test scores over the past several years, and the new (and highly experienced) superintendent has not yet agreed to be other than a stop-gap appointment.

o DC's violent crime rate continues to decline, and DC's cops are shooting many fewer citizens in the course of duty. But DC's ability to solve its crimes is declining even faster, and the MPD would be hard-pressed to claim credit for the receding crime wave.

o DC's Public Benefits Corporation has sacked its top (mis) managers, and DC's Foster Care Office has returned to DC control from an unsuccessful receivership. But DC's legions of mentally, physically, socially and financially disadvantaged are neither decreasing nor getting proper care.

o The recently authorized National Capital Revitalization Corporation has been formed and has prepared a draft plan of action. But there is as yet no indication that the NCRC has any coherent view of the city--other than as a laundry list of local neighborhood demands.

o The Washington Metrorail system opened the final segment of its initially planned system--a few weeks ahead of schedule and a bit under cost. It is a stunning addition to the metro area, and will figure strongly in the city's future socioeconomic growth. But there is no strong plan for continued growth--a few relatively minor projects are competing for funding with the ever-increasing operating costs of the present already-aging system.

o The very first (dredging) phase of the project to replace the Wilson Bridge across the Potomac was completed on time and within cost. But future progress is not yet assured on the bridge, and far more serious, DC and the region have yet to adopt a meaningful long-range transportation plan to avoid moving up from second to first place among the nation's most traffic- stressed metro areas.

o The City succeeded in showing a budget surplus for the fourth straight year, thus triggering the inactivation of its Congressionally-imposed Control Board. But knowledgeable people claim that the budgetary outlook remains "fragile" at best, and Congress remains unwilling to provide fiscal relief to DC by allowing financial burden-sharing across the metro area.(e.g., commuter taxes).

o Tom Davis, the very knowledgeable (and sometimes helpful to DC) Virginia Republican who headed the House Gov't Reform Committee's DC oversight committee has moved up to more important responsibilities. But the blatant conflicts of interest (between suburbs and central city) have now been transferred to the very knowledgeable (and sometimes helpful to DC) Maryland Republican Connie Morella. DC can expect no relief from the financial imbalances the Congress now imposes.

o The new Bush Administration has been installed along with the new members of Congress. But Bush has signaled little interest in--or understanding of--DC's unique problems, (or common metro area problems, for that matter). And the Congress has not changed its committee structure to alleviate its archaic oversight of DC's disenfranchised (and increasingly restless) population.

o The Supreme Court rejected two DC pleas for proper representation in the US Congress. But DC's ideological activists continue to press for their "statehood" fantasy despite very high indifference by residents to the local politics they could control.

o The new 2000 census count for the District indicates that the "mass exodus of DC's taxpaying middle class" over the past decade did not take place as alleged. But as yet, DC does not know what has really happened to the size and composition of its resident and taxpayer base.

Headlines from Dreamland
January 2001

As the new millenium officially begins, DC starts out on its third century, and a new, untested, era comes to the nation's capital, NARPAC dreams of visionary headlines in 2001 that would assure that Americans would regain pride in their nation's capital city. Here is a sampling:

New Congress Elevates Constitutional Oversight Functions of DC
4-Subcommittee Structure Gives Way to One Joint Committee on Metro Areas and DC

Region Formally Accepts Landmark Principle on Poverty Sharing
Counties Aim to Equalize Welfare Caseload based on Changing Population, Jobs

Suburbs Agree to Major New Initiatives in Public/Affordable Housing
Special Small-Unit Clusters to be Constructed near Centers of Job Opportunities

DC, Region, Federal Gov't Adopt Major 25-yr Metrorail Expansion Plan
'Ring Rail' Purple Line, Annapolis Line, Added Network for Anacostia Corridors

President Requests Special Base Study from Dept of Defense
Long-range Future for Andrews AFB Sought as Regional Economic Magnet

DC Government Bites Bullet on Personnel Accountability
Manpower Productivity to Be Compared Among All Regional Jurisdictions

21st Century DC Schools to Become Community Responsibility Centers
Civic Functions to be Incorporated into Design and Staffing of Modernized System

Progress in these fundamental areas would virtually assure that the core city of our national capital metro area was on the way to becoming an outstanding American city. Failure to make progress in these areas will virtually guarentee that the District remains at best, an average US inner city.

(For a total list of 52 wishful headlines, drawn from recomendations all over the NARPAC web site, please visit Dream Headlines)

Continue back to 2000 and 1999 Editorials

Continue back to 1998 and prior Editorials

This page was updated on Jul 5, 2005

home issues status analyses email

© copyright 2007 NARPAC, Inc. All rights reserved