| |
SUPERINTENDENT ACKERMAN PROVIDES HER OWN PROGRESS REPORT
Superintendent Ackerman, pretty much beleaguered on all sides, has provided
her own assessment of progress in a deeply troubled DC school system (January
30, '00). The Post has accused her of being overwhelmed by administration
problems, and thus spends little time on 'bold new reforms'. NARPAC is
beginning to suspect that a major problem may simply be that DC's single
school district is simply too large, its people too entrenched,
and its facilities too antiquated. But here are her own views:
Over the past few weeks, the governance of the
D.C. Public Schools has been the subject of much discussion. Recently,
there was even talk about declaring the school district in a state of
emergency as a justification for a mayoral takeover.
While this important debate ultimately will determine the speed of systemic
school reform, those of us charged with the day-to-day operations remain
focused on the prize--our 70,000 schoolchildren.
When I came to the D.C. Public Schools as the chief academic officer in
September 1997, I found a system in crisis. More than 70 percent of the
students were scoring below basic level in reading or math. No content
standards or benchmarks clearly stated what students should know and be
able to do by graduation. Accountability for students and staff was almost
nonexistent. Social promotion was the norm, and 89 percent of 10th-graders
could not perform basic math computations.
School facilities were in such disrepair that school opening was delayed
for three consecutive years. Per-pupil spending was inconsistent, varying
by as much as $4,000 per child. Almost 20 percent of the budget was spent
on central office bureaucracy, but the school district could not provide
an accurate count of students or staff. The backlog of special education
students awaiting initial assessments or hearings numbered more than 3,000.
Twenty-eight months later, I am proud to say that the school district
is making progress. Dedicated teachers, principals and staff members are
moving this troubled system from crisis to promise. Student achievement
is up. Fewer than half of all students now score below basic level in
reading or math. Content standards are in place for all subject areas.
More than 50,000 students have attended intensive summer, Saturday and
after-school tutoring programs to master the skills needed to be successful
at the next grade level, while some 6,000 students have remained at the
same grade level to receive additional preparation and support.
Each school has performance targets challenging staff members to improve
student results each year. Schoolsthat achieve their targets get monetary
awards. New principal and teacher contracts offer competitive salaries
and include pay-for-performance clauses. An aggressive recruitment effort
yielded 1,100 new teachers. More than 40 new principals are in place,
and the District now has a shorter time frame in which to remove ineffective
teachers--90 days.
Our central office now accounts for only 6 percent of the budget, and
student enrollment has been affirmed by an outside auditing firm for the
second year in a row.
The new Weighted Student Formula has closed the per-pupil spending gap
and given local schools authority over their budgets, including the staffing
of teachers and other critical personnel.
The backlog of special education initial assessments and hearings is now
fewer than 100 students, and at least one major litigation is under a
settlement agreement with the district. The capital improvement program
is progressing with at least one maintenance project scheduled for all
schools next year. For the the past two years schools have opened on time.
Yes, we in the D.C. Public Schools are making progress, even though I
am aware that many tasks lie ahead before we reach exemplary status. The
future of our school system, despite recent rhetoric, is showing signs
of promise. The successes have come although the governance structure
remains cumbersome and uncertainty about the budget and procurement system
persist; both these areas, however, lie outside our direct control.
A friend once said to me that when a school system fails, we should not
blame the children. The blame lies with the adults charged with the children's
well-being. Those of us responsible for implementing school reform remain
committed to making the schools in our nation's capital exemplary. What
we need now is the collective will of this community to get behind our
children.
|